Why cryptocurrency regulation matters for Africa’s finance sector

In Kenya, a new digital asset regulatory framework was formalised in November 2025, the Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASP) Bill.

Photo credit: Shutterstock

In the past decade, our financial systems have become more digitally interconnected than ever. Convenience and speed now come with a price: financial crime. From sophisticated money-laundering networks to cyber-enabled fraud rings, criminal actors are exploiting gaps in regulation and oversight.

As traditional finance evolves, so too have the methods and opportunities for abuse, and nowhere is this more evident than in the digital asset space.

Cryptocurrency and other digital assets promised a more inclusive and efficient financial system. But without the right guardrails, innovation can inadvertently create new avenues for exploitation.

Over the last several years, financial crime has grown alongside the digital economy.

According to a Chainalysis report by July 2025 over $2.17 billion were reported stolen from cryptocurrency services. But behind these numbers are real people. Small businesses locked out of working capital after falling victim to crypto scams.

Families losing savings to impersonation schemes. Young founders forced to shut down promising ventures because a single fraud incident wiped out their liquidity. Financial crime in digital assets is not abstract. It is personal, and its impact is often irreversible.

From darknet markets moving illicit funds to ransomware groups demanding payment in digital assets, criminals increasingly leverage digital currencies because of weak oversight, inadequate identity verification, and jurisdictional gaps in enforcement.

It’s why anti-money-laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CTF) controls are not bureaucratic niceties, they are essential infrastructure for a functioning financial system. Regulation is not a “nice-to-have”; it’s the safeguard that separates legitimate innovation from systemic risk.

Recognising these risks, Kenya and Ghana, last year adopted comprehensive regulatory frameworks for digital assets. At a time when many developed markets are still struggling to reconcile innovation with enforcement, their regulators are proving that clarity is possible.

These frameworks are not reactionary. They are deliberate, consultative, and built for long-term market health.

In Kenya, a new digital asset regulatory framework was formalised in November 2025, the Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASP) Bill.

This made the East African country one of the first in the region to clearly define licensing requirements, compliance expectations and supervisory oversight for VASP.

Similarly, Ghana’s Virtual Asset Service Providers Bill, 2025, which received president assent at the end of December 2025 marked a historic shift. For years, the digital asset market in Ghana had operated in a grey area - widely used by the public but lacking legal certainty.

With the passage of the VASP Bill and receipt of presidential assent, cryptocurrency activities are now formally legalised and regulated. This framework assigns responsibility to multiple agencies - including the central bank, securities regulator, and financial intelligence unit - to monitor transactions, enforce identity verification, and prevent illicit flows.

These laws are about more than legitimacy; they are about protecting individuals, businesses, and the broader financial system from abuse.

Financial crime isn’t just a compliance checkbox for multinational corporations - it’s a real threat that affects individuals, firms and economies.

Losses from fraud and money laundering erode consumer confidence and divert capital away from productive use. Illegal activity distorts markets and can undermine the foundational trust people place in financial systems.

Regulatory frameworks like those in Kenya and Ghana create what we call a “safe zone” - a space where innovation can thrive under clear standards that protect participants. Mandatory Know-Your-Customer (KYC) requirements ensure identities are verified. AML and CFT protocols detect and deter illicit flows.

And coordinated oversight enables regulators and operators to combine on-chain analytics with traditional compliance tools to identify suspicious behaviour in real time.

 The writer is Group Head, Transaction Risk & Financial Crimes, Yellow Card

PAYE Tax Calculator

Note: The results are not exact but very close to the actual.